“Action learning is a dynamic process that involves a small group of people solving real problems, while at the same time focusing on what they are learning and how their learning can benefit each group member, the group itself and the organization as a whole.”
In class last week we discussed action learning and the components of an Action Learning program. I felt a little lost during the discussion because I had never used or heard about this concept before. I also didn’t find the best articles or background information to really help me become more knowledgeable on this subject. So, after class I went on my search to find more. Of course, as Wendy says, Google has it all.
I came across an editorial by Michael Marquardt titled, Action Learning, and it sums up everything in a few pages. He discusses how companies employ Action Learning through strategic planning, developing managers, reducing operation costs, etc. He tells us what action learning is (as I quoted above) and lastly, the components of an Action Learning Program.
1. A problem, or project, challenge, opportunity, issue or task that action learning centers around. He talks about the importance of the problem and how it should “provide an opportunity for the group to generate learning opportunities.” The group may focus on one problem or multiples ones that members may bring to the table.
2. Action learning group or team are the ones who examine the organizational problem. The team is usually four to eight people who should have a diversity of background and experience. This will allow for a variety of perspectives and views.
3. Emphasizing insightful questioning and reflective listening above statements and opinions. “By focusing on the right questions rather that the right answers, action learning focuses on what one does not know as well as on what one does know.” These questions will help build group cohesiveness, innovative thinking and enhance learning results.
4. Taking action on the problem — if the group only makes recommendations, it loses its creativity and commitment. Therefore, no real practical learning until action is taken and reflected upon. “Action enhances learning because if provides a basis and anchor for the critical dimension of reflection.”
5. A commitment to learning: The learning that takes place has greater value for the organization that the immediate advantage. There is equal emphasis on the learning and development of the individuals and team as on the problem being solved.
6. Action learning coach: ( Dr. Carter!) This person helps the members reflect on what they are learning and how they are solving the problems. This happens through questions as the coach “enables group members to reflect on how they listen, how they may have reframed the problem, how they give each other feedback, how they are planning and working, and what assumptions may be shaping their beliefs and actions.”
Marquardt’s Model is different than anything I’ve heard of or read about before. I think his rule of statements only being made in response to questions quite interesting. It seems like something I would really have to think about if I was participating in this model of action learning. I do like the thought of having a coach, especially the role of intervening and pointing out good opportunities for learning. I think it’s easy to get wrapped up in statements and conversation as opposed to asking questions and learning from them. I look forward to implementing action learning next year and seeing this model unfold.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
http://www.gwu.edu/~bygeorge/021804/actionlearning.html
- Action Learning, A Powerful New Training Tool for Developing Individuals, Teams and Organizations